Skip to comments.
International Criminal Court Coming Into Being(And Ron Paul's Response)
usasurvival.org ^
| 4/2/02
| Cliff Kincaid
Posted on 04/04/2002 10:44:59 PM PST by BigWest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Is Ron Paul the only one with guts enough to stand up to "hot coffee" Annan and the rest of the anti-American crew at the UN?
1
posted on
04/04/2002 10:44:59 PM PST
by
BigWest
If the U.S. resists the International Criminal Court having jurisdiction over individuals, it should resist any such court having same -- including the one that's trying Milosevic. Otherwise, we're flaming hypocrites.
2
posted on
04/05/2002 12:38:24 AM PST
by
Greybird
To: *Ron Paul list;*"NWO";ratcat;Black Jade;madfly
Check the
Bump List folders for articles related to and descriptions of the above topic(s) or for other topics of interest.
To: BigWest
So Milosevic is really on trial for fighting terrorism? YES!!!!Ron Paul is RIGHT ON for opposing the ICC in toto, not going along with it or merely trying to "protect US servicemen". The ICC--as well as the ICTY--negates our 1,000-year-old system of jurisprudence, with its safeguards of the rights of the accused. America needs to stand FIRM for fair, civilized, and democratic standards of jurisprudence throughout the world.
As the ICC nears implementation, the traitor chorus of "human rightsers" and world "federalists" are coming out of the woodwork, claiming "victory for humanity". However, the ICC's implementation would mean JUST THE OPPOSITE !!!!
The evil "genius" behind the ICC (and the ICTY), M. Cherif Bassiouni--is after victory for something else--making islamic sharia law equal to the American system of jurisprudence, and putting muslim "judges" on the international bench, to rule on cases involving "infidels" and "disbelievers" as defendants, where they are considered guilty even beofre the "trial" begins. This is already happening in the ICTY!!!
To: backhoe;Sabertooth...
ping
5
posted on
04/05/2002 11:13:31 AM PST
by
madfly
To: *UN_list
ping
6
posted on
04/05/2002 11:16:52 AM PST
by
madfly
To: BigWest
"Senator Daniel Inouye Kills Anti-ICC Legislation "
Someone who gives a damn about our troops and America should kill Senator Daniel Inouye! These Goddamn Communists think that Freedom is free, well ask the men and women who died fighting for America's freedom what the price was for them. The ultimate....DEATH. THAT'S WHAT THEY PAID FOR US TO BE FREE!
7
posted on
04/05/2002 11:20:10 AM PST
by
B4Ranch
To: madfly
Hmmm... So let's see... Young Americans can now join our armed forces wanting to "serve their country" (as I did), be used as cannon-fodder in some unconstitutional "police action" that we shouldn't even be involved in, and then end up in some foreign prison (or worse) because they broke some regulation or "international law" that they in all likelyhood weren't even advised on (such as shooting back when coming under fire).
Boy, that's going to inspire a lot of volunteers.
To: madfly
bttt
To: madfly; BigWest
...signatures from 60 nations will suffice to authorize creation of the international court...
Charter of the United Nations
CHAPTER XVIII
AMENDMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article 108
Amendments to the present Charter shall come into force for all Members of the United Nations when they have been adopted by a vote of two thirds of the members of the General Assembly and ratified in accordance with their respective constitutional processes by two thirds of the Members of the United Nations, including all the permanent members of the Security Council.
click here for UN charter link
Clinton, by signing the UN treaty, allowed the UN Court to be born, according to the UN charter. Permanent member of the UN Security Council have veto powers and can stop any amendment. The Court was not inevitable until Clinton signed the treaty.
As long as we are in the UN, this part of the Constitution:
He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur
is superceded by this part:
This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
Constitution link
The balance created by our founding fathers is negated. The president has power to create any law he wishes through the UN regardless of the Senate's wishes.
Get the US out of the UN.
10
posted on
04/05/2002 5:45:55 PM PST
by
jadimov
To: madfly
"UN bureaucrats don't care whether our Senate ratifies the ICC treaty or not," Paul stated. "The Clinton administration signed the treaty, and the UN views the signature as final. It arrogantly announced that signatures from 60 nations will suffice to authorize creation of the international court. Paul's resolution calls for President Bush to declare that the U.S. does not intend to ratify or assent to the ICC treaty.
Bump.
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: ratcat
Senator Jackass from Hawaii is a proponent of "ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT"! He thinks it's inevitable. How can such traitorous dupes be put into positions of power ? Kinda makes ya' wonder ? Ron Paul usually "gets it" but he is literally an "army of one".
May God save the Republic!
15
posted on
04/05/2002 7:45:36 PM PST
by
lawdog
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: lawdog
I think that you can kind of get the gist from the article that GW is quite coperative in these international matters. We sure know that he loves China. He will probably go along with this too in the end. Bring on the NWO.
17
posted on
04/05/2002 8:03:41 PM PST
by
Revel
To: ratcat; Joe Brower
Thanks for the "dung" ping ratcat. I lately wonder who on earth is living in our country? Is every legislator a traitorous moron? It seems that our "popular" culture has taken on a life of its own - media & college students were the first to be sucked in, but it has invaded the church, the schools, and even our own "representatives" have started to believe the lies they once hid from public view. Thanks heaven fo the FR - sometimes the only voice of common sense and reason there is in my day. As FReeper Joe Brower stated: it's going to inspire a lot of volunteers NOT!
To: ratcat
Thanks for the ping.
Government is not the solution to our problem,
Government is the problem.
-Ronald Reagan
To: Libertina
Haven't you noticed all the intelligentsia having orgasms talking about "the new American Empire" ! How far we have drifted from our Constitutional foundation. No good will come of it- none!
20
posted on
04/05/2002 9:38:57 PM PST
by
lawdog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson