That's what I'm getting at. The point cited is a minor part of the article. -you-
Hate to disagree with you on this point, however, there was a point in the author of the article pointing to the interbreeding of these animals. It shows some important points:
1. speciation is not as the evolutionists claim, specifically, long periods of isolation of two groups do not result in sufficient genetic change to prevent interbreeding.
2. genetic change is very slow if it occurs at all. This ties with the conclusion on the finches that while there were phenotype changes occurring in these finches in a very short time, these changes wavered back and forth, a disproof of evolution.
3. evolutionists have claimed that these finches are different species. The author is showing that isolation does not prove speciation. In fact, during this research, some of the so-called different species were seen interbreeding and producing mixed young that could also breed.
The whole article is a very strong disproof of evolution and that is why the evolutionists here do not wish to talk about it and have been avoiding discussion of it since the thread started.
Post 908 deleted by the Moderator. (Skipping a few steps.)