Yes, I deny using your gender against you. I am often silly in my posts, but I don't bully women.
Groping you? Truly, that's the last thing that would ever enter my mind. (It won't even be the last thing, because I don't intend to die with that being the final thought in my mind.)
The trigger for our discussion in this thread -- your revealing that you had received freepmail regarding my private speculation that you had another name on FreeRepublic -- that's gone right through, without denial. All your subsequent points, about freepmail paranoia, my alleged betrayal, and now this groping stuff, have not deflected my attention from the central point, which AndrewC noticed immediately, that you had ratted out someone who betrayed my confidence. So that little point stands, and it won't go away. Now it's "groping" that we're dealing with. Right. Hot topic.
I have the freepmails you mentioned. I can post them here. I can post the whole boring story here. Then everyone can see what your grievance was all about -- hardly the stuff for which the abuse button was made. But these events are 18 months old; and I don't want to do that. Why won't you let this thing drop?
I sense that something else is going on here. Are you (and perhaps some of your friends behind the scenes) trying to goad me into posting something so outrageous that you will then feel "justified" in hitting the abuse button again? That must be it, because I can't imagine any other reason for your continuing to drag this incident out. If that's the game, it won't work. Let it drop.
Oh dear. More tinfoil.
Let me take this one step at a time because you are being very unforthcoming. You made this statement earlier.
I haven't betrayed your freepmail confidences (because there were none) and I haven't lied about any of this.Do you deny I sent you a freepmail?
What is so strange about this is that this was discussed before. With names! On a open thread! Nothing new here. Why the sudden interest in my reminder?
I'm honored that you would use me as a reference. Now the same applies WRT No-kin. As to the "ratted", that was a poor choice of a word in trying to be humorous, exposed would have been more correct. In the convoluted world of the ersatz, I expect things would get out of hand as they have. I believe Nebullis argument here more than yours. She has no axe to grind. Her self esteem does not rest in any fashion on how many creationist scalps adorn her belt. It is now apparent by your post that you did confide in someone that you suspected Nebullis of being someone else. Is that very much different than my assertion WRT No-kin? I, however, did not confide "secretly" in anyone, I honestly and bluntly confronted suspect number 1. My first post on the subject after the "shadow boxing" was---
| To: PatrickHenry wonder why the other creationist types didn't jump in when ol "No-Kin" was battling all alone? My guess is they couldn't follow his arguments Things aren't always what they appear to be. |
Your integrity is going negative.
Don't violate poster privacy - Don't reveal online another poster's phone number, address, or other information that the person hasn't already made public for everyone on Free Republic.
The last part of the citation is especially relevant.