Replies

But No-Kin finally staggered, exhausted and harried, over the finish line. He was barely pretending to be an E anymore and disappointed in the simplicity of my point when he saw it. (All I'd intended with those "Birds arose from a line of reptiles" and "Mammals arose from a line of reptiles" clues was that they weren't the same line of reptiles.)

Anyway, if the genetic material from which mammary glands originally developed (mutated, whatever) is present in the "tree", wherever that may be, I suppose the potential exists for such material to be expressed again, although in a different species. I just don't know. Well, yes, there's the platypus, isn't there. I suppose, if the platypus isn't a separate creation of the lord, then it's a separate expression of the same mutated genetic stuff that resulted in mammals

Hi No-kin. Did you forget what you wrote. This is a reminder. Remember also these little tid-bits are not in isolation.

Hi No-kin.

Your delusions amuse me, but shall I start addressing you as "jennyp?" She's admitted being you.

Did you forget what you wrote. This is a reminder. Remember also these little tid-bits are not in isolation.

The excerpt of No-Kin's floundering shows me nothing except that he's got rather shaky legs as an E, to the extent he can remember he's trying to be one. What does it prove, with or without isolation?