I know. There's never a point scored in that respect, though. The delusional system is a deliberate and very emotional decision on their part. One that can't be overcome with rational science.
I must strongly disagree with that. It is the supposed 'scientists' - the evolutionists - who refuse to engage in a scientific discussion of evolution. I and others have posted some quite serious objections to the interpretation of descent presented by evolutionists which have gone completely unanswered. Perhaps the greatest example of such refusal to engage in scientific discussion on this thread is the total disregard of the article that started this thread by evolutionists. The article clearly refutes the use of Darwin's finches as a proof of evolution. It is a scientific refutation using well researched observations, there is nothing 'delusional' in it. Are you willing to take up the challenge or are you like other evolutionists going to just repeat the mantra 'anyone who disagrees with evolution is a nut case' like you do above?