I rather enjoy Andrew's slow dissolve, but have avoided appearing to encourage it. But how is he pulling you with him?
No-Kin shows a little humor at points. He could have picked "Evolution-Boy" up from the mock exchanges Patrick and I have had at times without actually being either of us.
Not to say that No-Kin isn't an impersonation. My snap reaction to that screenie was the same as everyone else's. But I disavow all knowledge. Furthermore, my long-term reaction to No-Kin is that he's a sincere individual who's too harmless to the C image to be a mischievous plant.
Do you also share Andrew's suspicion that longshadow and others share some sort of complicity in whatever Andrew thinks happened? He's recklessly hurling aspersions all over the forum and you think maybe he's onto something?
For the record, I think there's more to the Monkey Man of India than there is to Andrew's charges. Monkey Man was pure hysteria. The Phantom No-Kin is Andrew's paranoid rationalization of a bad review.
Ah, a simple shrug of this nature would have been much more convincing to me and, possibly, to other readers.
But I disavow all knowledge.
I don't know what to think of a statement like this, because, quite seriously, your integrity, (as well as PH's, which I had given the benefit of the doubt over the last year and a half), has imploded on these last few threads.
Do you also share Andrew's suspicion that longshadow and others share some sort of complicity in whatever Andrew thinks happened?
As I told "longshadow" just a few short posts ago, I think others share a flippancy (a flippancy I also shared on the Common Creationist Arguments thread). That's not complicity with the fakery, it's complicity with derisive mockery of AndrewC's aspersions. I think you know the difference.