[gore3000]

Maybe that's the approach the evos need to look into. I mean, Darwinism is flatly falsified by the fossil record, Gouldism is patently idiotic, and even Stevensism appears to be fairly limited in explainatory power.

If you mean by Stevensism that guy Steven Dawkings, he is dumbest of the lot. He cannot get anything right. All he gives is wild speculations and non-sensical "proofs". However, he is completely in the Darwinian tradition of charlatanism.

[longshadow]

..... he is dumbest of the lot. He cannot get anything right. All he gives is wild speculations and non-sensical "proofs". [emphasis added]

Gee, does that remind you of anyone?

Like someone who claimed that the planets have "wildly" elliptical orbits, and then tried to claim that RA's table of planetary eccentricities as "proof"?

Try looking in the mirror.

And when you're done, you could start apologizing to all the people you insulted on the thread whose only crime was trying to point out your error.

[medved]

If you mean by Stevensism that guy Steven Dawkings...

Not really; what I had in mind was the George Stevens' version of evolutionism...