I have just such an hypothesis, which is one among many, and I have given pointers to it, and others, on more than one occasion in discussions with you, including here. Are you off your meds, or just too lazy to breath for yourself? I'll repeat what I said before in greater detail, as it seems to have set you off on a tizzy of verbal diarrea from whence you are unable to get back to responding to the point cogently:
Just because science hasn't demonstrated natural abiogenesis, as currently conceived, doesn't demonstrate that any other particular explanation for genesis is true. No one has demonstrated that there can only be a binary choice between the Christian God and Abiogenesis. If you think such a demonstration exists, you are welcome to point it out.
Science has given several proofs against abiogenesis, proofs which have been posted to you, refered to you and which you have refused to discuss. This is not about "possible", just about anything is possible so saying that abiogenesis is "possible" is saying nothing at all. As I have told you, disprove the scientific proofs given against abiogenesis, or state your hypothesis. Your constant excuses for not doing so show quite well that your position is totally baseless.