So? The slight of hand trick involved here is the excluded middle argument: "Bacteria are the starting point of life". Prove it.
Bacteria are the simplest self-reproducing form of life - as I said. There is no slight of hand in that, it is scientific fact, whether you like it or not.
I have asked you quite a few times for your hypothesis for abiogenesis, and you continue to refuse to state it. Your refusal to state it is strong proof of my assertion that atheists do not even have the vaguest idea as to how life could have arisen from non-living matter. Your refusal to even discuss what you disagree with in the article posted way back in post#11 by Heartlander is additional proof of the invalidity of abiogenesis. Here's the link again in case you wish to discuss the article (which I am sure you will not): abiogenesis
Have you figured out yet what's wrong with your phrase "eukaryotic bacteria?"