[Junior]

You exist but do not learn. Vade has already given you the entire family tree, sans gaps. He's posted pictures of Archaic Homo Sapiens from more recently than 200,000 years ago and explained that many folks lump these fellas in with H. Erectus. You scream and prattle about "evidence" but when we show you evidence you ignore it -- as you've ignored repeated requests to explain your somewhat dubious claims (hippos/whales, coyotes/whales). And, when you've been called on this you resort to calling your opponents "liars" even when they are simply reposting your words verbatim.

[PatrickHenry]

Lurking (cloking device still on) ...

[gore3000]

Archaic Homo Sapiens from more recently than 200,000 years ago and explained that many folks lump these fellas in with H. Erectus.

It is you who does not listen. The reason these 'archaics' are not classified as anything is because there is insufficient evidence to classify them. Believe me, paleontologists indulge in very wild speculations, even going to the extent of classifying two teeth as the ancestors of a toothless species, and they do not dare classify those fossils as homo sapiens. Therefore, your evidence is such bunk that not even those on your side of the fence dare to call it ancestors of homo sapiens.