Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
It may (or not) be science, but it shows a lack of understanding of airplanes, trains, automobiles, bicycles, carriages, horses, feet, etc. (Did I put the carriage before the horse?)
463 posted on 04/05/2002 7:43:36 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies ]


To: Doctor Stochastic
It may (or not) be science, but it shows a lack of understanding of airplanes, trains, automobiles, bicycles, carriages, horses, feet, etc. (Did I put the carriage before the horse?)

My statement may sound silly, but it shows exactly how silly the statement is by evolutionists that physical distance proves speciation. No you cannot breed without close proximity but that does not mean that a geological event for example creates new species. It does not. Such silly statements are given by evolutionists because they completely lack proof of real evolution having ever taken place, so they make up false definitions so that they can massage the evidence to prove what they want it to prove.

481 posted on 04/05/2002 10:07:55 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson