That's not evolution, that's not even speciation. A human in Los Angeles cannot breed with a human in New York City, but that does not mean that they are different species. You make up such nonsense because you know your theory cannot give proof of a species ever transforming itself into a new, more complex organism.
Catholic priests and nuns, hmmm......I think the definition needs a little more work.
Is this science?
It might look different if you weren't filling the thread with blue spew, but given that you are, it's amusing that you have to run away from your own misdeeds and errors.
You claimed you had proven me a liar for the following supposed contradictory statements:
1) Humans and chimps have the identical molecule for cytochrome c.
2) Humans and chimps differ by a single DNA triplet in the genes for cytochrome c.
After I showed you that there are tons of redundancies in the DNA code (18 of 20 amino acids having more than one triplet that codes for them), you ran away, leaving your charge of "liar" unretracted.
You have also called me a liar for correctly conveying to others that you say we don't know if dinosaurs had mammary glands. Never mind for a moment that evolution has a line of reasoning that they definitely should not have had them, the point is that you said a thing, you called me a liar for telling other people you said it, and on this thread you've gone back to saying it again.
A bizarre performance.