[gore3000]

gore300: Oh yes, your famous proof that because evolution says something - that dinosaurs cannot have mammary glands - therefore we must accept such proof without any evidence~ We must take your word for it. Such a brilliant proof Vade! Circular reasoning, with a pound of arrogance, and big doses of stupidity. We must all bow at your brilliance! -me-

Again, you make a point of not understanding.

No you make a point of giving rhetoric instead of evidence. I want to know what proof (meaning facts, evidence, not bs) that dinosaurs did not have mammary glands. We have proof that fish do not have them, we have proof that birds do not have them, we have proof that reptiles do not have them. I want to see the same proof that dinosaurs did not have them. I do not want a long discourse on the meaning of "is" or "alone". I do not want a lot of rhetoric or sophistry. I want facts, nice solid facts and you do not have them and will never have them. You have been going on with your excuses and your rhetoric for half a dozen posts. There is no proof, there are no facts, except a phony theory that spews garbage instead of giving evidence for its statements.

[VadeRetro]

Your 454 looks very odd as an answer to the post it pretends to answer. You called me a liar for accurately recounting what you said.

[VadeRetro]

I want to know what proof (meaning facts, evidence, not bs) that dinosaurs did not have mammary glands. We have proof that fish do not have them, we have proof that birds do not have them, we have proof that reptiles do not have them. I want to see the same proof that dinosaurs did not have them.

Now that you're back to saying what you called me a liar for saying you said, let me remind you that you flunked the challenge last month. Give up yet? (BTW, you could / should have read the answer already.)