There is no devastating evidence against abiogenesis. Other than a lot of people saying "oy, it looks really hard to me!".
This will not cut the muster in scientific journals. As has been said over and over to folks of your ilk, without apparent affect: "absence of proof is not proof of absence".
There certainly is and it is proven by your inability to refute any of the scientific evidence mentioned in the abiogenesis article on post#11. Let me give you a few problems:
1. DNA - it would take a series of over half a million DNA base pairs to code for the simplest life.
2. Pasteur - proved that life does not arise from non-living matter.
3. RNA - cannot reproduce by itself.