I believe a genuine effort is made to keep information truthful and current. Where they are of significance on the E side, corrections are incorporated, new information is presented, errors are admitted. A lapse into chatty conversation, (rehashing of old grudges--my specialty), or jokes to lighten the mood can't be derided. We're real people here. This is not a professional journal but a discussion forum which occasionally rises to the level of public debate with interest to a wider audience.
I would not say that is correct on the evolutionist side. They keep bringing up arguments that have been previously refuted quite convincingly. Take the question of macro-evolution for example. Evolutionists keep bringing up such nonsense as birds that have different mating calls as examples of evolution and speciation. Also, evolution itself has quite a bad track record when it comes to correcting its errors, over a hundred years after Haeckel's fraud on drawing the embryos of different species, they are still in school textbooks.