Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
Re: Arp's redshift refutation:

=========================================

Title:
Combinatorics and companion galaxies: Paradox lost
Authors:
Newman, William I.; Terzian, Yervant
Affiliation:
AAUniv. of California, Los Angeles, CA, US ABCornell Univ., Ithaca, NY, US
Journal:
Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 441, no. 2, p. 505-506 (ApJ Homepage)
Publication Date:
03/1995
Category:
Astrophysics
Origin:
STI
NASA/STI Keywords:
COMBINATORIAL ANALYSIS, GALACTIC CLUSTERS, INTERACTING GALAXIES, RED SHIFT, DISTANCE, PROBABILITY THEORY, SAMPLING
Bibliographic Code:
1995ApJ...441..505N

Abstract

Arp (1994) has presented redshift data for the Local Group of galaxies and for the next major group, whose largest galaxies are M31 and M81, respectively. He observed that the relative redshifts of all 22 of their companions were positive and claimed that the likelihood that this would occur is 1 in 4 x 106. We show using the classical combinatoric paradigm of ordered samples (without replacement) that the correct probability for the dominant member of each cluster to possess the lowest observed redshift is approximately 8%.

360 posted on 04/05/2002 12:58:49 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies ]


To: longshadow
Was that 1 in 4 times 106 (not 106)? All I can get from that abstract is that Arp got an answer wildly out from somebody else's version on a probability calculation.
364 posted on 04/05/2002 1:14:05 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson