[gore3000]

Evolution is the change in alelle frequency over time.

You cannot even tell the truth about the theory you defend. Have you not read your petty-god Charles? Evolution is the descent of man from measly bacteria. It is a denial of God's role as THE Creator. And tell us you are not an atheist. We need a good laugh.

[Dimensio]

You cannot even tell the truth about the theory you defend.

The accepted scientific definition of evolution is change in alelle frequency over time. It isn't my fault that the accepted scientific definition (which you can look up in any reputable science journal) doesn't match your personal strawman.

Have you not read your petty-god Charles?

Darwin it not and was not a "god".

Evolution is the descent of man from measly bacteria.

You are speaking of Common Descent. Common descent is an extension of evolution -- that is, it requires evolution as a driving force, however evolution itself is far more fundamental and much smaller in scope than "bacteria to man". Falsifying evolution would falsify common descent, but falsifying common descent (ie, proving that man's origins did not originate at single-cell life forms) would not falsify evolution.

It is a denial of God's role as THE Creator.

Neither evolution nor common descent make any statements regarding the existence or intervention of any dieties. Such statements show a complete ignorance of the scope of science.

And tell us you are not an atheist. We need a good laugh.

Why would I make such a statement? I am an atheist and I have never claimed otherwise.