No, science is not about proof, as I have gone over with you repeatedly. I don't have to have proof, I just have to have the most likely sounding story extant, and some arithmetic to back it up.
It is you who is going against everything that science knows about life. It is you who is arguing for the almost impossible. You cannot even tell us how such a thing could have happened. You have not even tried to overcome the objections put against your theory.
I gave pointers to the Woese article on creature annealing, and tutorials, and "Nature" articles to prepare you to read the Woese article. Ignore it if you wish but do not expect me to mistake willful, ignorant whining for rational discourse.