[glorygirl]

50 words

The view of the church --and of many catholics -- is that homosexuals are not sinning in that regard unless they actually participate in homosexual sex. For that reason, homosexual priests are "less guilty" and onerous than heterosexual priest who forsake their vows.

Not everyone's opinion, I know. Just the church's.

[saradippity]

Because this is so important,I am going to try again.Can either of you tell me,or anyone from the church tell me,what objective criteria will be used to rid the church of homosexual priests?Thankyou. If I get no response then I will assume that you don't know,and if you don't know can you not see what a perilous endeavor we are launching without clear direction.

Remember Satan is the Father of lies,lies lead to confusion,confusion to chaos and chaos is the exactly where the enemy(on earth and in the supernatural world) wants all of God's people to be.Then the "lord of the world"can reign.There are probably people on these threads who are looking forward to that takeover,if so,Truth makes no difference. But if it is not so,then be very careful or we will wake up one morning and all will be dark.

[iranger]

"The view of the church --and of many catholics -- is that homosexuals are not sinning in that regard unless they actually participate in homosexual sex. For that reason, homosexual priests are "less guilty" and onerous than heterosexual priest who forsake their vows."

I believe that the act defines the label. That is, we're all hetero until you decide to take from tree that is forbidden. A priest that is chaste is hetero. He's only a homo if he's engaging (or maybe wanting to engage)in homo acts. So, the only homo priests you have are active ones. I am not of the belief that the homo crowd just received a different set of numbers in God's chromosomal lottery? I recall Genesis and the Garden of Eden having man and woman. On which day did God create homos and lesbians?