[Always Right]

In my experience, global warming skeptics that cite the uncertainties in the surface station data usually get somewhat tongue-tied when they read about the borehole data, which fully supports the observed trends.

In my experience Global Warmers cherry-pck data to suit their needs. Global Warmers get tongue-tied when they talk about satellite data, Medieval Warm Period, and the Little Ice Age...

[cogitator]

In my experience Global Warmers cherry-pck data to suit their needs. Global Warmers get tongue-tied when they talk about satellite data, Medieval Warm Period, and the Little Ice Age...

Some might. I won't. I'd be glad to discuss any of these with you in detail. (The Esper tree-ring data recently published was a nice confirmation of the Medieval Warm Period, which pretty much had to have occurred to allow settlement of Greenland by the Vikings.)

You got a favorite?