Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb
"At any rate, they expected a fight, prepared for a fight, picked a fight, got a fight, and lost it. The concept of "peaceful secession" was never in play."

If the concept of peaceful secession was "never in play" it was because Lincoln said he would never allow it in the first place. The South prepared for a fight because Lincoln said he was going to bring them one. This despite the fact that the Constitution does not prohibit the States from secession nor does it grant the Fed govt the power to prohibit it. Still, you have not answered the question of why peaceful secession would constitute "insurrection" when nothing in the Constitution prohibits it and the Constitution specifically reserves for the States all powers not specifically delegated to the Fed?

150 posted on 04/03/2002 12:44:43 PM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: joebuck
If the concept of peaceful secession was "never in play" it was because Lincoln said he would never allow it in the first place.

Henry Clay's compromise of 1850 is credited with averting civil war, and for holding the Union together.

Given that Lincoln wasn't elected until 10 years later, one cannot blame him for the violence. It was probably inevitable.

170 posted on 04/03/2002 1:10:28 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson