OK let's take 'em one at a time; we are now getting somewhere. I will post a new thread and we will discuss the NARROW issue of whether or not the Ape's suspension of Habeas Corpus was constitutional and what precedents it set. I appreciate your other... er... "research" and we will get to those later.
Agreed?
Why don't you do so and title it along these lines:
SUSPENDING HABEAS CORPUS, DOES THE CONSTITUTION ALLOW IT AND HOW?
Just a suggestion; you title it the way you see fit. I would be interested in exploring that issue and would welcome input from both camps.