...Aside from these three drugs being defined, as dangerous substances, they haven't been compared to any shared medical definition, nor equated with the term, pharmacological properties. These three drugs, are part of a comphrehensive list of controlled substances...Being defined as dangerous?
Wouldn't a demonstration of the danger (by someone not beholden to the Feds for their $$) be a little more convincing?
Do you expect to get actual SENSE from the highly-misnamed Reagan Man? Or A CA Guy or any WODDIE? Hope not, it'll be a long time coming!