What I was talking about was that there were excerpts of his FBI interview that were not released or made intitially available to the media that may have been somewhat esculpatory. Much of this evidence has still not been made public knowledge. So what I am saying is that the FBI knew that had a weak case and so they release an incomplete picture to the media. The media siezed upon it, and now they have convicted the man in the court of public opinion. Typical big "S" State tactics, enough to make this Freeper blush.
So what I am saying is that the FBI knew that had a weak case and so they release an incomplete picture to the media. Wishful thinking. I wouldn't bet the farm on that, if I were you.
I imagine there ARE things that we don't know, but there're not going to come down in Johnny's favor.
What are you so intent to defending this traitor? And he IS a traitor, no matter how you dress him up.