Posted on 04/01/2002 1:38:53 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
|
| U.S. Taliban fighter John Walker Lindh returned to federal court on April 1, 2002 as his lawyers battled with government prosecutors over what kind of evidence can be used in his conspiracy trial. This picture, released by Lindh's lawyers on April 1, 2002 as part of the evidence, was taken by the US government when Lindh was at Camp Rhino in Kandahar, Afghanistan, in December 2001. Photo by Reuters (Handout) |
Of course, I said "Ooooh.......he got us with that one." ROFL !!!!!!!! This is way too easy.
I am actually surprised that even as dense as he is, he doesn't know when to give up. Nothing he says, at this point, can change what has taken place. A brighter person would be wise enough to let it die. But then again.....I said "brighter person".
I will be away today but I'll have to tune in later and be entertained by more of his genius (*snicker*). He can't resist coming back to prove our point. Isn't it grand? LOL !!!!!!!
To: EricOKC
Oh, BTW Eric, I forgot to ask you if you ever came across (no pun intended) Gary Condit in any of your "sessions"?
481 posted on 2/12/02 6:54 AM Pacific by Registered
I think he's losing it. Don't you? LOL!! He thinks if he posts in BIG FONT, no one will see his hypocrisy when we post his own tacky, sick and pathetic stuff. Did he think we hadn't seen it?
You're right - this is way too easy!
If he thinks it's all in-bounds, I guess he must be okay with his kids seeing it. I wouldn't want my nine year-old nephew to see it, I can tell you that much.
Let's put it this way. I would not be concerned if someone said your words in front of my grandkids. I wouldn't encourage it, but it wouldn't be a major deal.
OTOH, I would do everything to shield them from a person who posted the now familiar Reg images and filthy innuendos that have graced this forum. The difference is undeniable and all the posts in the world won't change that FACT. But I'm sure he will continue to try. Some people recognize a waste of time; some don't.
I think we can speak in past tense now. He has lost it. As someone said to me yesterday......."Not only is he registered, he's certifiable."
I'm with you. Forced to make a choice, I'd MUCH rather my nephew heard "rat's ass" that lewd references to the word "coming".
What planet is this guy on? He makes me sick.
Is that in reference to my reply #345?
No, I just copied what you created and said.
Look, Registered, this is getting really old for everyone. I just want to say this:
I honestly don't care what you do, say, or create. It really doesn't mean anything to me. The problem is that you have been been harassing me since the first time you addressed me. I would be perfectly happy to leave you alone - but I fought back because of your attempt to suggest that you are morally superior to me (I think it's been demonstrated that nothing could be further from the truth), and because of your assertion that I have no right to simply state that the phrase "God D_______" is anti-Christian language. It is. Why argue? Why make that an issue you want to pursue? The day I reprimand someone for saying "rat's ass" is the day you have a point - I would readily concede that - but it seems you're always looking for some way to embarrass or injure me, even if I've stated a perfectly legitimate point.
And why? Because I don't like Alan Keyes? Is all this really worth it?
My personal opinion of your images is that - combined with your subsequent comments - they're more than just bad taste. They cross the line, and I think they could be interpreted as sexually explicit when they appear with your comments as they did on the original thread. I cringed when I first saw your graphics and remark (before you wrote your "pot, meet kettle" post), but I'm an adult, and I said nothing. (My test: I seriously would not want a child to see them, and I don't think people think of this website as one with content only appropriate for adults - but whether these things should be removed is not my decision to make.)
I know a lot of people enjoy what you do, and there are even some who enjoy these sexually suggestive creations. I'm not one who does, but I believe in your right to express what's on your mind. I did not, and would never have tried to, turn you in for what you did - however distasteful I find it. I only pointed it out because you were trying to nail me to the wall for something any reasonble person would consider far less objectionable.
I don't want to continue this. I don't think anyone wants to. You and I will never be friends, but this is not fun for me, and I know it can't be fun for you. I'm not even sure I want to stay on FreeRepublic after this repugnant episode.
I wish you well, and I am sincerely requesting that you stay away from me, and I will do the same for you. Honestly. This has been good for no one. If I hurt you, I apologize.
I don't know if it's PORN, per se, but I do know that when I was looking at my messages (which included your graphics) my teenaged son walked in the room, and I scrolled the page QUICKLY.
Does that tell you anything?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.