Skip to comments.
**CAPTION TIME** Photo of Lindh at Camp Rhino in Kandahar, Afghanistan
Yahoo News Photos ^
| 4-1-02
Posted on 04/01/2002 1:38:53 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
![alt](http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20020401/i/1017700035.2550194218.jpg) |
U.S. Taliban fighter John Walker Lindh returned to federal court on April 1, 2002 as his lawyers battled with government prosecutors over what kind of evidence can be used in his conspiracy trial. This picture, released by Lindh's lawyers on April 1, 2002 as part of the evidence, was taken by the US government when Lindh was at Camp Rhino in Kandahar, Afghanistan, in December 2001. Photo by Reuters (Handout) |
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: johnwalkerlindh; taliban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 341-354 next last
To: Registered
Hey, Registered, what's this all about......is that on purpose...Geeze, I'm braindead today...
181
posted on
04/07/2002 3:03:05 PM PDT
by
KLT
To: KLT
I was told by those two posters that the images were pornographic. They're not of course, but they think otherwise.
To: Registered
Are you kidding? They were'nt at all....you remember some of the stuff I posted, with Hitlery in underwear with certain male parts....I thought for sure I was gonna get censored for that one....Geeze, who decided that? Did someone complain?
183
posted on
04/07/2002 5:00:26 PM PDT
by
KLT
To: Registered
Registered, who took the pictures off the server and replaced them with the "censored" signs?
Did DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet and Southflanknorthpawsis remove your pictures from the server and replace them with those signs? If they did, I'd surely be raising a stink if I were you!
Or did you do it yourself?
If you did it yourself, isn't saying they censored the pictures a lie?
If the pictures are not pornographic, why don't you just put them back & let everyone judge for themselves
184
posted on
04/07/2002 5:10:40 PM PDT
by
Amelia
To: Amelia
And who took the question mark off the end of my last sentence, anyway???
185
posted on
04/07/2002 5:13:29 PM PDT
by
Amelia
To: Amelia
I had nothing to do with removing those images. I only know that
somebody put this post and this picture together - and it sure wasn't me:
To: all
P.S. I'd animate the hands, but then again, we are a PG-13 forum...
3 posted on 4/2/02 8:52 AM Pacific by Registered
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
A courtesy ping for you.
To: All
And a
link to what I posted above.
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Thanks for the ping.
I can see why Registered is defending his picture and the accompanying comment. Wouldn't any good, wholesome man/dad/husband be pleased to share such a thing with his family? < /sarcasm >
......and just think, this is mild compared to some others. Oh well........I guess one man's treasured art is another's offense.
The only thing I don't get is that this particular connoisseur jumps back and forth depending on his mood on a given day. I guess that's a topic for another forum.......*giggle*
To: Amelia
Amelia, I already stated on another thread the reason why I pulled the images and placed that disclaimer up. The primary reason was I was being charged by them for posting "porn". Daughter in particular lied and told everyone that they were pornography. She spread the rumor so much that I even had a few people contact me to ask me what were in the images. After I sent them the images for their review they laughed to think that anyone thought that they were porn. They are PG13, and frankly I don't believe I have ever crossed that line when it comes to any images that I have created. I'd be happy to send you the images too, and don't worry, they won't come to you in a "brown paper wrapper" as some have implied.
To: Southflanknorthpawsis;Northpaw
Well, if we're going to bring "family" into the argument, how do you feel about this comment from Northpaw?
"Kinda reminds me of the joke where the 5th grader comes home from school and says "Dad, I have a bigger ***** than anyone else in my class. Is that because I'm black?". 'No', replies his dad, "It's because you're 17"
This comment, like my little joking hand comment, came from a professing Christian. Now madame, how do you feel about the joke? I'm not so uptight that I understand that the man was joking. But you, no you, you would question my Christianity for my little hand jokes and the graphics that I posted? Or do you have one standard for my family and another for your own?
My apologies to Northpaw, I thought the little joke of yours was funny at the time, but your sister is trying to hold me and my family up to a standard she has yet to attain herself.
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Oh I forgot.......*giggle*
To: Registered; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; Northpaw; Howlin
You are one very desperate small man. I can't imagine any normal male reaching so far to try and dig out of a hole.
Please explain why you have brought my brother into this. What does that have to do with your nasty little graphics and mouth; let alone me?
This is so irrelevant and pathetic !!!!! However, I'm glad you keep posting this garbage. It allows anyone who's looking to see what you're really all about. You just keep getting worse.
The fact that you chose to bring an innocent bystander into this because you have nothing with which to defend yourself says so much about you.
A real man wouldn't even consider this wimpy, sniveling tactic. Are you sure you are male? I'm beginning to wonder.
I don't personally know any man that would stoop to this kind of nonsense. Maybe that's because I steer clear of girlie-men......
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Walker Lindh is restrained in pretty much the way VC/NVA were restrained during Viet Nam. It is just no big deal to make sure he can't escape or conspire with other prisoners to escape.
Anyone who thinks differently is pretty much demonstrating a cavilier attitude towards the safety of the Marines/soldiers tasked with guarding him.
Walt
To: Registered
trying to hold me and my family up to a standard she has yet to attain herself......and since you have a comprehension deficiency, I'll also clear this up for you.
I never mentioned your family's standards. I referred to them only in the context of your sharing your humor with them. It was about you; not them.
Since you have again been transparently misleading, I challenge you to show where I held anyone but you to a "standard"? You can't produce it and you know it. But you will try.
Many of us have seen you make a claim and then painfully squirm to retract. Does "50 things" ring familar? Bwahahahahahahaha !!!! What was that again.....a bumper sticker on both cars???? WOW !!!!!
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Sorry you don't see the hypocrisy of holding one person to a standard while ignoring the actions of another. Wasn't that a funny joke your brother posted?
BTW, it WAS funny but if you hold true to your posting standards, he's in for a reprimand from you.
To: Southflanknorthpawsis;Northpaw
Oh, and don't forget to question his Christianity while you're at it...
To: Registered
Not that I expect a girlie-man like yourself to understand this, but there is a major difference.
My brother has never scolded another freeper and talked about setting examples and offending God.
I have kept from going there, but since you want to push this and keep twisting reality, it may be time to post the two sides of Registered; Mr. Holy and Mr. Vulgar.
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Kind of reminds you of Bill Clinton, doesn't it? Right out of the DNC playbook.
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Have I called you any names?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 341-354 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson