[Southflanknorthpawsis]

Hopefully the majority of our "questions" will be answered over the course of the trial.

From pictures and logic, I weigh on the side of the marks being unrelated to anything having to do directly with Danielle. Perhaps time will prove me right or wrong. I'll settle for either one as long as I get an explanation.

Then again.....we may never know. I believe that unless the marks can be traced to hard evidence, the prosecution might not go there.

[Freedom2specul8]

Then again.....we may never know. I believe that unless the marks can be traced to hard evidence, the prosecution might not go there

True, and if no hard evidence isn't produced, I'm wondering if the judge would refer to it in his jury instructions.

Hey, did you read that he requested a speedy trial? Less money spent..and to fast pace it like that..I'd be scared if I were him. I wonder why the defense requested that.

[Freedom2specul8]

if no hard evidence isn't produce Should have read if no hard evidence is produce