[medved]

Sorry, but the image of that main pyramid and the most recent face image above simply don't leave any room for doubt. Anybody claiming thoswe are natural formations is a feeb at best and likelty worse than that.

[goody2shooz]

There have been recent "revealing" (pardon the pun) infrared photos indicating the possible ruined foundations of cities buried beneath the surface of Mars. NASA and Jet Propulsion Labs seem rather embarrassed, frankly.

But I really wanted to post a link to a very interesting site at MIT concerning Maritime Archeology.

Deep Arch Program

15,000 years and before that, so much of earth's water was locked up in ice that the sea level was 400 feet or more BELOW present day's sea level. The ruins of cities have already been found off of both coasts of India at depths that would have been dry land 20,000 years ago, stone pyrmids just off the coast Japan (Okinawa) and I wouldn't be surprised if there weren't cities out in the bottom of the Caribean or out in the mid Atalantic.

[dinodino]

I must be a feeb, because I looked at those photos and they sure as heck don't look artificial to me.

The human brain is great at discerning patterns where none exist.

[dinodino]

Oh, and here's another thought that you von Daniken/Art Bell types never address:

If there *are* remains from an intelligent civilization on Mars, and if NASA know this, then why aren't they hyping it and using this golden opportunity to raise money for a manned Mars mission?

Why? Because there are no ruins to be explored, simply average photos of boring rock formations in which some misguided individuals see "ruins."

Real science is so much more interesting than these hoaxes, anyway! We may yet find evidence of past life on Mars, but it'll be at the microscopic level.