This is the same numbnut paper that was claiming the prisoners at Gitmo were being tortured because they were wearing earmuffs.
Ever seen a room-to-room batle against guys who were still alive and kicking, but not surrendering?
The rag makes it clear they didn't surrender and goes to great lengths to claim Arafat is not a prisoner, so do you think these peckerheads were waving a white flag of surrender?
Here's another one for you: do you know anything about the Geneva Convention definition of a prisoner of war?
If you did, you would know that these people do NOT fit it the lawful combatant requirement because they do advocate the use of suicide bombing, forbidden as it is in the rules of war. They sure as heck don't fit in as noncombatants. Hiding asmong civilians - in with the British counsel no less... is not the act of soldiers in a properly organized armed force, but an act typical of terrorists.
How dare you compare these SOBs to a SEAL. The SEAL was wearing a uniform, the uniform of a nation which does NOT advocate suicide bombing and which does NOT hide its armies among civilians or dress its 'heroes' up in women's clothes and wigs to blow up pizza parlors and bat mitzvahs and to deliberately target people in grocery stores. The SEAL was part of a force which does NOT threaten to assasinate reporters and cameramen for filming street celebrations. The SEAL was part of a force which does NOT threaten to exterminate entire populations as do the scumbags clinging to Arafat's employ.
Pop Quiz "Literally"