Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Long Cut;Snow Bunny;SK1 Thurman;hijinx;68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
In discussing H-wood stars during WWII you forgot Jimmy Stewart.

As I recall, Stewart was a bonafide war hero, and even attained very high rank (General?).

He also had a son who served, and was killed, in Vietnam. The only angry or negative thing I ever heard him say publicly was in an interview where he essentially said of the Vietnam war protesters "Damn them all to hell."

18 posted on 03/31/2002 8:55:49 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Behind Liberal Lines
There's probably a lot more I passed over. Some might have been like Audie Murphy or Aldo Ray, who became actors AFTER the war. Like the others, it speaks to the morality of the time. Today, a war hero of Murphy's caliber would never get in the door at many production companies. He'd be regarded with suspicion, at best, instead of with respect. A man who had actually killed so many people, even in heroic wartime action, would be an object of fear and loathing to those who run Hollywood. As I said, such men are as living examples of what typical Hollywood denizens are not.

IMHO, most of the flip-flop to the current belief system occurred in the 1960's. By demonizing heroes, and painting them as fools, baby-killers, and ticking time bombs, those who cowardly refused to serve could seem, to themselves at least, to be "better" than those they attacked and ridiculed. It was an absolutely sick and evil way to justify and validate an inexcusable, self-centered cowardice. Unfortunately, it played directly into the hands of those whose motives were the destruction of America and those positive values for which she stands.

This forced "paradigm shift" ran its course by 1980 or so in every segment of society except those with the most invested in its perpetration: the entertainment industry and academia. Sadly, these were the very segments with the ability to keep that Leftist concoction of discredited beliefs on life-support. Those holdover '60s liberals will be around, still pushing their self-justification for craven cowardice, for at least another 20-30 years. They have infected one, maybe two generations with their selfish poison. The best we can do is to reward those, like Gibson and Milius, who do not slur their own country to salve their vestigial consciences. Besides, their movies are more fun.


19 posted on 03/31/2002 3:51:42 PM PST by Long Cut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
As I recall, Stewart was a bonafide war hero, and even attained very high rank (General?).

Stewart gained weight for the privilege of taking his chance of taking a flak shell
on his underside while flying (a B-17, IIRC) over WWII Europe.
He did retire at some level of the grade of General.

And I remember hearing him talk about the loss of his adopted son (from his wife's
first marriage) in Vietnam.
What struck me was that he said while it was a sad thing that his son died young,
it was NOT a tragedy.
He said the son died leading his men and doing his duty...and that can't
really be a tragedy.
(Made a big impression on me, given how I was a confused pre-teen during most of Vietnam.)
22 posted on 03/31/2002 4:19:46 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson