1 posted on
03/30/2002 1:02:28 AM PST by
Nogbad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-145 next last
To: Nogbad
I feel like protesting with a profane, personally directed, racist and violent post.
To: Nogbad
This will CERTAINLY take some getting used to.
3 posted on
03/30/2002 1:04:08 AM PST by
Aeronaut
To: Nogbad
The sidebar on the left is a complete waste of space, and the new layout of the headings is not as efficient.
Blech!
5 posted on
03/30/2002 1:06:08 AM PST by
Petronski
To: Nogbad
What a shock. Just made my coffee and woke up to this. I can't get the topics into the sidebar, even after reading the instructions. I feel I'm missing out on something. I want my old FR back!
6 posted on
03/30/2002 1:06:36 AM PST by
Giddyupgo
To: Nogbad
You have to make your own sidebars now. Personally, I never liked the sidebars anyway because they just took up space. I guess instead of having one extra column that was easy to get rid of, we now have two extra columns that we're stuck with.
8 posted on
03/30/2002 1:09:17 AM PST by
Sandy
To: Nogbad
You shoulda been practicing with the Beta version all last week :-)
Personally, I think the changes are great.
Well done JohnRob! *S*
11 posted on
03/30/2002 1:11:26 AM PST by
Happygal
To: Nogbad
There was a time (not so long ago) that FR had NO sidebars at all. And I like the flag graphics. Bravo!
To: Nogbad
It's an early April Fool's joke, Right?
To: Nogbad
Article fonts are too small.
To: Nogbad
For those who use largest text font on your screens to read threads are you getting sea sick scrolling? If so then try adjusting your text size to medium or otherwise you will get the continious wave while scrolling.
To: Nogbad
For this FReeper in the boonies, who can only get 28k dialup at best, on a good day, this is NOT an improvement.
Slow to load and cluttered once loaded.
Maybe I'm being an old fart about this, but I was quite happy with the way it was two hours ago. It was MUCH faster to load, too; very important if you have limited bandwidth.
To: Nogbad
All of the printing (fonts) around the top and sides are outrageously small. I may need my magnifying glass pressed to the monitor. I like most of the changes BUT if I was totally new to the site it would be most confusing.
To: John Robinson
I don't know John ... remember when the McDonalds Trainees went from brown paper hats to blue paper hats? I think my point is clear.
To: Nogbad
If JimRob wants to do a "Question" in the sidebar, I have a suggestion:
"Do you like this better than the old FreeRepublic format? Yes or No."
I'll start . . . . . No.
To: Nogbad
I take back my #14 because I'm starting to find my way around already. (And I'm 'puter challenged)
To: Nogbad
This STINKS ! It is virtually incompatable with WebTV, it hurts my eyes, it takes FOREVER to load, it looks dreadful, is NOT user friendly, and I HATE, LOATH, and ABOMINATE it.
Was there even a warning ? If so, I missed it.
This is what the begathons produced ? Did anyone even ever bother to ask if WE wanted / liked this set up ?
To: Nogbad
While I am a Conservative I do not resist change for the sake of improvement. This is NOT an improvement! I love my country's flag, but I do not need to have it take up a quarter of my screen.
I want my old FR back!
35 posted on
03/30/2002 1:24:15 AM PST by
Chief
To: Nogbad
BOOOOO!!! Come on!!! This is slower than hell!!
The flag graphics are OK but the layout SUCKS!!!
Thanks for the effort guys but this off the mark.
36 posted on
03/30/2002 1:24:31 AM PST by
zarf
To: Nogbad
Don't fix it if it ain't broken!
The new format is awful.
To: Nogbad
Worse than awful
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-145 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson