Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
It was the 1982 cuts that brought the top rate down from 50% to 25%

I think you are wrong about this. Here is what the Prentice Hall Documents Library says, in part, about the Tax Reform Act of 1986:

Other features of the Tax Reform Act of 1986:

Tax cut. The top marginal tax rate on wealthiest individuals was reduced 44% (from 50% percent to 28%). The marginal rates for leass wealthy individuals were also reduced, but not by as high a percentage. Tax reductions were said by some critics to underly the massive mushrooming of the federal deficit during the Reagan administration.

Here is the link.

66 posted on 03/29/2002 4:20:24 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: vbmoneyspender
One other thing, the Reagan tax bill stopped all personal interest deductions other than on real estate, limited medical deductions and greatly reduced deductions for employee business expenses.
75 posted on 03/29/2002 4:24:10 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: vbmoneyspender
I don't know how anyone can write this when the top rate in 1985 was 25%. Care to explain to me how an increase from 25% to 28% is a cut? I don't know where they get the 44%. That was the rate prior to the 1982 Economic Recovery Act, but NOT prior to 1986.

Also, the more you keep posting on this, the more I keep recalling the other "hikes" involved. Note the end of the investment tax credits, which DRAMATICALLY increased the real tax in investments.

90 posted on 03/29/2002 4:36:38 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson