[rbmillerjr]

Your words: A reputable source will be required to prove you're not a disruptor.

I know it's hard for you to make the distinction between being proven guilty and requiring one to prove their own innocence - no problem just a little subtlety included in the Bill of Rights.

[Howlin]

When somebody posts something on these threads, we all expect them to be able to BACK IT UP. That's hardly "proving one's innocence." It's proving you know what you're talking about.

You seem to REALLY have a comprehension problem.