[rbmillerjr]

Youve noticed those tactical retreats too?? How about my question: why not critique George to wake him up? Notice no responses to that.

[Texasforever]

How about my question: why not critique George to wake him up? Notice no responses to that.

Do you see any lack of "critique" around here? Hell when accusing a president of treason. malfeasance and calling for impeachment is NOT enough "critiquing" then I don't know what to tell ya.

[Neets]

What the HELL are you talking about??????????? HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM...I see I have my work cut out for me...you men are soooooooooooo hard headed when it comes to FIGURING out the STRATEGERY HERE...isn't that a man's skill??? And do you NOT think that Karl Rove et al, do not have people here lurking to see the comments of "critique" as you call them?????????

[fightinJAG]

BTW, I'm a girl and I'm fun to debate, or so I've been told.

I agree totally with critiquing GWB. That's even a nice way to put it---let's criticize him when appropriate.

What I take issue with is ballooning that into the notion that we're in some kind of constitutional crisis. Puh-leez.

I had the same problem with Rush trying to equate the right to criticize Bush with the responsibility to stop Bubba's crimes. NO moral equivalency there!

If you want to criticize Bush, be my guest and let me pull up a chair from time to time, too. But don't go on jawflapping about how there is this moral clarion call to criticize Bush on a policy issue lest we become just as bad as the people who protected the Slickmeister on character issues. Double puh-leez.