[ibme]

true pedophilia is extremely rare
which can lead to sexual relations with sexually mature but underage boys

OK, so now they are no longer children but sexually mature but underage
Pull your pants leg up, it’s getting deep.

Is this the daily whitewashing posting?

[patent]

true pedophilia is extremely rare which can lead to sexual relations with sexually mature but underage boys

OK, so now they are no longer children but sexually mature but underage Pull your pants leg up, it’s getting deep.

Are you saying you see no difference with raping a 5 year old child and having sex with a 17 year old boy or girl? I would regard both as wrong, but there is a bit of a difference between what the word child means and what a sexually mature but under the age of consent (18 or so years old, depending on where you are) boy means.

patent  +AMDG

[wideawake]

Question for you: If a heterosexual male sees a fully-developed woman whom he presumes to be an adult and finds her to be attractive, only to learn later that she is only 16, is he a closet pedophile?

Of course not - he was not attracted to her because she looked prepubescent: he was attracted to her precisely because she had the figure of an adult woman.

The problem is not celibacy - the problem is homosexuality.

Very rarely do we hear of priests having affairs with 16 or 17 year old girls - instead we hear of them carrying on with 16 or 17 year old boys. If homosexuals were banned from the priesthood, as they used to be, then these problems would not exist.