Okay, so why'd he sign it, when he didn't have to?
His signing it just becomes harder and harder to understand. I followed hobbes1's argument (though I think he's wrong, and the Pubbies are going to get burned bigtime), but does the President really intend to rely on the Supreme Court instead of stepping up to a piece of legislation he knows is wrong?
Either that, unpalatable as it may be, or face the fact that Bush does not care about the Constitution. Put yourself into a BBNs (Bush-Brown-Noser) shoes and which would you choose to advocate?
EBUCK