The line is wherever the Supreme Court decides it is; I'm a lot more comfortable with that than letting some of the people around here decide what I can and cannot say.
The "living document" theory. That's a novel approach, for someone on a conservative forum.
That's your interpretation of what I said; the Constitution CALLS for the Supreme Court to decide differences.......or are you claiming THEY'VE been wrong all these years, too?
According to you, the SC had no right to rule in the Bush-Gore 2000 question.
298 posted on 03/28/2002 10:22:44 AM PST by Howlin