To: Sloth
I believe the Constitution CALLS for the Supreme Court to adjudicate the law; unless you have a different interpretation, you're wrong.
291 posted on
03/28/2002 10:19:31 AM PST by
Howlin
To: Howlin
OK. (Calmly and in a normal tone of voice) Are you saying that the Supreme Court is designed to be the arbitor of first resort regarding legislative constitutionality? Is it proper for the legislature to debate and pass and for the Prisident to sign into law any bill they so desire with no consideration to its constitutionality simply because that's not their job, its the Supreme Court's?
To: Howlin
I believe the Constitution CALLS for the Supreme Court to adjudicate the law; unless you have a different interpretation, you're wrong. Unless, of course, the Supreme Court SAYS I'm right, in which case I am, because the Supreme Court is God, after all, and the Constitution doesn't mean squat until they say it does, and even then only until they change their minds and say it doesn't.
What a strange world you must live in where words change their meaning every day.
304 posted on
03/28/2002 10:28:39 AM PST by
Sloth
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson