Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hobbes1
I agree with you-- Bush signs the CFR bill so that it will be declared unconstitutional. Then neither McCain nor Daschle nor anyone can get in Bush's face and say he was anti-campaign reform-- and a Consitiutional issue is settled, not to rear its ugly head again any time soon.
25 posted on 03/28/2002 8:18:51 AM PST by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Clara Lou
It is, the Only way to kill it. Veto, or Filibuster, would only have kept the issue around.

38 senators voted against it. Do these mypoic bastards expect people to believe that McConnell couldn't get 2 more for a filibuster???? He just about declared he did, then changed his tune....After being instructed by the WH.

32 posted on 03/28/2002 8:21:48 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou
Ever heard of ends not justifying means?
56 posted on 03/28/2002 8:31:15 AM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou
"Bush signs the CFR bill so that it will be declared unconstitutional."

And how do you know this? Bush has never said as much. Did he sign the education spending bill in hopes that such a waste of the taxpayers' money would be declared unconstitutional? Did he sign the Patriot Act hoping it would be declared unconstitutional?

60 posted on 03/28/2002 8:32:29 AM PST by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou
He could have not signed it, it would have become law anyways.
175 posted on 03/28/2002 9:28:21 AM PST by thepitts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson