Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OWK
Huh? So, you support the current "hard money" restriction of $1,000, believe its Constitutional, and believe the President violated his oath and the Constitution by not vetoing a bill to increase that limit to $2,000, right????
219 posted on 03/28/2002 9:46:18 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker
So, you support the current "hard money" restriction of $1,000, believe its Constitutional, and believe the President violated his oath and the Constitution by not vetoing a bill to increase that limit to $2,000, right????

Bump.

248 posted on 03/28/2002 9:58:11 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

To: colorado tanker
Huh? So, you support the current "hard money" restriction of $1,000, believe its Constitutional, and believe the President violated his oath and the Constitution by not vetoing a bill to increase that limit to $2,000, right????

There should be no limits whatsoever.

The way to eliminate graft and corruption in government, is to eliminate the extra-constitutional influence that legislators and executive officials have to begin with. If we put the federal government back in the constitutional cage the founders crafted for it, then these bastards wouldn't have any influence to peddle (and corruption would be a thing of the past).

No limits on our rights are necessary.

268 posted on 03/28/2002 10:09:35 AM PST by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson