Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: colorado tanker
. But I've never tried to buy one of those ads and most likely never will.

But Barbra Streisand can still go on Rosie O'Donnell's show and give a nice long speech about why everyone should vote for Al Gore THE DAY BEFORE THE ELECTION and that is still legal. How many fat cat sources did that money come from?

When they restrict the Corporate giants who own media outlets to the same financial limitations then we can talk about the issue ads being "no big deal". I give to interest groups who advertise and I'd like to keep that right thank you very much!!!!!!!!!

205 posted on 03/28/2002 9:41:49 AM PST by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: RAT Patrol
If you want a bill out of Congress that reverses the liberal advantage of controlling Hollywood and the media, you might as well jump on the ship to Neverland.

In all the hysteria over the part of the bill none of us likes, ya'll overlooked the fact that "hard money" just doubled. Pubbies collect gobs more hard money than Dems. So, the Pubbie interest groups will advertise up to 60 days before election, then the candidates will use their hard money to carpet bomb the airwaves to rebut Babs and Rosie.

Assuming the Supremes do their duty and hold the 60 day restriction unconstitutional, this bill becomes majorly pro-Pubbie.

In the last 40 years, the Courts and Congress have done a lot of stuff that IMHO infringes my Constitutional rights. CFR is probably 55 on my to do list. Conservatives shouldn't be getting their panties in a wad over this - restricts the blood flow.

253 posted on 03/28/2002 10:00:07 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson