In the motor home, they found her blood and her fingerprints. Damning evidence fer sure.
Sure is. Based on all the news accounts, there is just too much evidence against him. Not only the blood and fingerprints of the victim, but also his trip to the vicinity where the body was found, his suspicious behavior when he got stuck and needed a tow, his equally suspicious behavior at the dry cleaners where he took the bloodstained clothing right after his weekend junket, his large collection of child images (some of which the police have characterized as "pornographic"), his admitted interest in cultivating Danielle's mother (an interest he acted on).
I heard somewhere that one of his fingerprints was found in Danielle's bedroom. If that report was not just loose talk, I would think the case against him is a slam-dunk.