Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coulter liberally attacks liberals as anti-American crowd
Springfield News-Sun ^ | 28 March 2002 | SHAWN ANKROM

Posted on 03/28/2002 6:55:13 AM PST by Deadeye Division

Coulter liberally attacks liberals as ‘anti-American crowd’

By SHAWN ANKROM, News-Sun Staff Writer

Ann Coulter held little back in attacking liberals during a speech Wednesday night at Wittenberg University.

Coulter's half-hour barrage before some 200 people in the Shouvlin Center painted liberals as the "anti-American crowd."

"They control the media," said Coulter, who launched into criticism of liberals who don't support the war against terrorism in Afghanistan.

"We've finally given the liberals a war against fundamentalism and the oppression of women and they don't want to fight it," said Coulter, an author, conservative and legal analyst. "They would, except it would put them on the same side as the United States. I never realized liberals used the term 'flag waver' as an epithet."

"The liberals will be after the Amish next," said Coulter to laughs. "As usual, liberals are not just wrong but are aggressively, symphonically, perfectly, 100 percent wrong."

The war is a religious battle, Coulter said, although not by the standards of Osama bin Laden and the Taliban, and not a war against Muslims, but against Muslim terrorists.

And it is a religious war for Christianity.

"The miracle of America, the unprecedented freedom we have in this country can't be understood apart from the Christian world view of the framers (of the Constitution)," said Coulter. "This nation was founded as a Christian experiment."

Coulter's criticisms were specific, attacking politicians and journalists by name, as well as broad criticism, as in the case of some women liberals.

For his criticism of the Rev. Jerry Falwell's political position, Coulter said retired television journalist Walter Cronkite displayed the "dispassionate and critical judgment that earned him the title most pious blow-hard in America."

As for President Carter, she wondered why anyone listens to him.

"He couldn't even land a helicopter in the desert," she said.

And "it wasn't Gloria Steinem who invented equality of women," she said, "It was Jesus Christ."

"It's the explicitly Christian idea that all men are created equal and that no man has the right to rule over another man without his consent ... that was the revolutionary concept that was the core of the American revolution," Coulter said.

While most in the audience applauded the author of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton" and "Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right," not everyone agreed with her opinions.

Before the speech, the audience was asked to be respectful and protesters would be asked to leave.

Annie Wagganer, a senior at Wittenberg, told Coulter her attacks against liberals were disrespectful.

"I really value how you stand on these Christian values," said Wagganer. "One of the Christian values that I really value is that you edify and build people up. So far I've figured out (from the speech) why not to be a liberal, but I haven't come up with any reason to be a Republican."

"Have you heard anyone publicly speak before?" was the quick response from Coulter. "Did you listen to anything Bill Clinton ever said in his entire presidency? Was that edifying?"

Coulter's speech was presented by the Wittenberg University College Republicans and the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 03/28/2002 6:55:13 AM PST by Deadeye Division
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Deadeye Division
Bump for telling it like it is.

Where's the obligatory Ann Coulter pic? ;)

2 posted on 03/28/2002 7:03:23 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deadeye Division
You go girl...Ann has more cajones than anybody in the GOP...loved her line "debating liberals was like shooting fish in a barrel"
3 posted on 03/28/2002 7:06:50 AM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Well, if you insist...


4 posted on 03/28/2002 7:08:45 AM PST by Bars4Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Deadeye Division
bump
5 posted on 03/28/2002 7:10:11 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deadeye Division
Springfield is a two newspaper town, Springfield Shopper and this one? Hmm, Homer's never mentioned it to me!
6 posted on 03/28/2002 7:13:38 AM PST by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deadeye Division
When I grow up, I want to be Ann Coulter!!
7 posted on 03/28/2002 7:16:30 AM PST by Beep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deadeye Division
Ann Coulter really has a way with words that could be construed as being a radical, right-wing nut.

I wonder if she would marry me.

8 posted on 03/28/2002 7:19:59 AM PST by SpottedBeaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deadeye Division
This should be the new "talking points" for Conservatives! The liberals have painted us as mean-spirited, we should now paint them as being "anti-American."
9 posted on 03/28/2002 7:24:33 AM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deadeye Division
I'm an Ann Coulter fan, and I agree with her substantive positions almost all the time, but I don't think she's doing herself or the cause of freedom any good by slathering generic "liberals" with vitriol. A lot of good and decent people still style themselves as liberals. If we want to have a shot at opening their minds, we should refrain from demonizing them, except in those specific and blatant cases where particular evildoers can be identified and held up for objective condemnation.

Conservatism ought to be above this sort of thing anyway. Aren't we supposd to be the better-behaved bunch?

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

10 posted on 03/28/2002 7:24:46 AM PST by fporretto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Deadeye Division
"We've finally given the liberals a war against fundamentalism and the oppression of women and they don't want to fight it," said Coulter, an author, conservative and legal analyst. "They would, except it would put them on the same side as the United States..."

Game, set, match.

Next...

12 posted on 03/28/2002 7:31:03 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: fporretto
It would be impossible for Coulter to sort out the liberals into the good and decent people and the anti american crowd. If Ted Kennedy would tell Walter Cronkite he is all wet, then Ted could be good and decent for the day. They need to do it for themself.
14 posted on 03/28/2002 7:35:19 AM PST by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Deadeye Division
From the article: "Whenever white liberals are in trouble, they always run to the blacks."

Excellent observation. And why, you may ask? Because that's their safety zone where they can't be and won't be criticized, by liberals or conservatives all shaking in their panties lest they themselves be accused of being "RACIST!" Works every time!

15 posted on 03/28/2002 7:37:06 AM PST by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: vanilla
Start with everybody at the New York Times or watch any TV or Cable news except FOX.
17 posted on 03/28/2002 7:39:36 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vanilla
Who are the liberals that control the media?

Start with Arthur Sulzberger and Stephen Case.

18 posted on 03/28/2002 7:42:43 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fporretto
We tried that and wound up with X42 for 8 years.
19 posted on 03/28/2002 7:42:50 AM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Deadeye Division
"I really value how you stand on these Christian values," said Wagganer. "One of the Christian values that I really value is that you edify and build people up. So far I've figured out (from the speech) why not to be a liberal, but I haven't come up with any reason to be a Republican."

Every time some someone tries to push the Christian doormat philosophy, I consider it my cue to blast their eyebrows off.

The Golden Rule isn't a command for us all to be brown nosers.

20 posted on 03/28/2002 7:44:14 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson