Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWC_minion
If they don't then the bill is constitutional and you should have no beef with Bush's principles.

No, it means that the court failed in its duty to uphold the 9th, 10th, and, more likely than not, the 1st amendments (not to mention Article I, Section 8) via judicial review. Do you really think I'm stupid enough to swallow your bull?

56 posted on 03/27/2002 7:22:33 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
No, it means that the court failed in its duty to uphold the 9th, 10th, and, more likely than not, the 1st amendments (not to mention Article I, Section 8) via judicial review. Do you really think I'm stupid enough to swallow your bull?

Then you want a government that decides issues on how you personally perceive them to be. Isn't that called totalatarian ? If that is what makes you happy count me out.

65 posted on 03/27/2002 7:35:53 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson