Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Twodees
Maybe it's time you pull your head out of Wonderland and look at the way things ARE.

There is more than one way to skin a cat, and if you can do so and make less of a mess, then it might work out, even if it will not work.

The fact is, within fifteen months, this bill is dead, save for the increase in the hard-money limit and the disclosure requirements. The Dems are losers, and will be routed on this.

The DNC probably had their Enron/CFR ads ready to go, they probably cost a few million to produce. They don't have it now. One principle we must understand if we are to get things right is the principle of calculated risk, by which we will do things that may damage us ONLY in instances where there is a probability that we can inflict greater political damage on the Left.

Right now, we have to pick our fights carefully, and attack only when we have an advantage and on the issues we have an advantage on. Furthermore, we may need to be willing to accept that fact that politics is messy.

I also do not see how letting Hillary or Gore or any other Dem will help what we stand for, and the same goes for letting the Dems keep the Senate and take the House. If anything, such an occurence will only make things worse.

301 posted on 03/28/2002 3:53:23 PM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies ]


To: hchutch
The bill would have been dead had he vetoed it. The votes to pass it over a veto weren't there. This isn't part of some grand strategy of Bush's to foil the democrats' dastardly plan. If you think it is then you watch too much Cartoon Network.
305 posted on 03/28/2002 5:15:52 PM PST by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson