I voted for a leader who had the savvy to outfox the Dems, and the guts to face our enemies overseas.
I didn't vote for your clone. So Sorry.
I didn't vote for Jesus Christ. He didn't want the job.
I am a realist. There are more ways to take a hill that to charge blindly into enemy gunfire. I voted for a savvy politician I trusted to do the best he could with the mess this country is in and the extreme danger we are in.
In 1992 I predicted the WTC bombing and the attack on Washington, with a maybe for Los Angeles within a decade. North Korea has nukes and missiles and we are running our butts off trying to make ABM's work so we can stop paying Clinton's nuclear blackmail to them. And we are in a race against time to get Saddam before he gets nukes to give to terrorists. And if you read the SOTU speech carefully, you will see that Bush knows this.
I'm sorry that my NRA has to spend my bucks to take this bill to SCOTUS to stop this damned DEM mischief meant to undermine our Commander in Chief at a most perilous time in our nation when he is busy getting our ducks in a row to take out Iraq before they gut our entire government.
I'm sorry it offends you that anything anywhere might be deemed just an ounce more worthy of Presidential attention when he is trying to focus the national attention to be ready for Iraq and needs to clear his desk and the news media obsession with Democratic garbage.
The SURVIVAL of D.C. is imperative, whether you understand that or not. Under conditions of war, things get delegated. CFR just got delegated to SCOTUS, and I expect them to do their job.
Face it, ma'am. Signing a bad bill into law is taking responsibility for it. The President's powers include the power of veto. Signing this dreck makes it W's responsibility now, since he didn't exercise his power to stop it.
I'll let you know in a few years whether or not your statement qualifies as the most ridiculous. It'll take that long to wade through all the other recent statements contending for that title.
At least the dems tell us they want big gov't and high taxes, while the repubs are doing the same thing on a "piece meal" basis. I suggest you take an overview of what bush has done domestically. Oh yes, they throw a nugget with a small tax reduction while they vote themselves a $4,600 pay raise at the midnight hour with an amendment. As for the tax reduction, many people are finding that it may not be a "windfall" after all, just a pre-payment on 2001's returns.
I know that you must compromise in politics, but, this guy is not compromising. He's taken the dems programs just as clinton took the 1994 repub program as his own.
He didn't even fight for the nomination of Judge Pickering until it was too late.
He issued an exec order for law enforcement not to co-operate with congress's investigation of the lowlife clintons, what is that all about? They protect each other just as they will find a scapegoat in enron and protect the moneys boys and girls. They also conveniently have no interest in global crossing. Just the fact that terry mac made $18,000,000 from a $100,000 "investment" should raise a red flag for an investigation of some sort.
What bush done is what congress does, which is to say, they set-up a gov't agency and then they appoint bureaucrats to run them, thus abrogating their their power to un elected officials who rule us by "fiat". In bush's case, he did not have the decency to take a stand and chose to abrogate his responsibility to the Supremes.
The worst mischief always gets passed under cover of "the war effort." Been true throughout human history. True now.