Posted on 03/27/2002 6:23:59 PM PST by TLBSHOW
Today I have signed into law H.R. 2356, the "Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002." I believe that this legislation, although far from perfect, will improve the current financing system for Federal campaigns.
The bill reforms our system of financing campaigns in several important ways. First, it will prevent unions and corporations from making unregulated, "soft" money contri-butions -- a legislative step for which I repeatedly have called.
Often, these groups take political action without the consent of their members or shareholders, so that the influence of these groups on elections does not necessarily comport with the actual views of the individuals who comprise these organizations. This prohibition will help to right that imbalance.
Second, this law will raise the decades-old limits on giving imposed on individuals who wish to support the candidate of their choice, thereby advancing my stated principle that election reform should strengthen the role of individual citizens in the political process.
Third, this legislation creates new disclosure requirements and compels speedier compliance with existing ones, which will promote the free and swift flow of information to the public regarding the activities of groups and individuals in the political process.
I long have believed that complete and immediate disclosure of the source of campaign contributions is the best way to reform campaign finance.
These provisions of the bill will go a long way toward fixing some of the most pressing problems in campaign finance today. They will result in an election finance system that encourages greater individual participation, and provides the public more accurate and timely information, than does the present system. All of the American electorate will benefit from these measures to strengthen our democracy.
As a policy matter, I would have preferred a bill that included a provision to protect union members and shareholders from involuntary political activities undertaken by their leadership.
Individuals have a right not to have their money spent in support of candidates or causes with which they disagree, and those rights should be better protected by law. I hope that in the future the Congress and I can work together to remedy this defect of the current financing structure.
This legislation is the culmination of more than 6 years of debate among a vast array of legislators, citizens, and groups. Accordingly, it does not represent the full ideals of any one point of view.
But it does represent progress in this often-contentious area of public policy debate. Taken as a whole, this bill improves the current system of financing for Federal campaigns, and therefore I have signed it into law.
GEORGE W. BUSH
THE WHITE HOUSE,
March 27, 2002.
When you say Dubya never worked a day in his life, you give yourself away as someone who has never supported him.
I used to have to post the list of his summer jobs during college and the jobs he had afterwards before he began his own business in order to counter the seminar BushBashers like yourself during the Election.
For someone as imbued with anti-Bush myths as yourself, discussion is useless.
Boy, you're giving every argument you can think of for why we need to just give up. Do me a favor, will you? Go join the democrats. They need some of your input on how to give in and kiss butt. Maybe if your strategy catches on with them, we'll be rid of them in a few election cycles.
If the GOP can't carry their own banner and advance their own agenda when they have the White House and the House of Representatives, then they need to all just take their dumb asses home and get out of politics.
That's assuming that the GOP stands for any of the principles you seem to think they do. I don't have any such illusions. These traitors are deliberately trying to get things back to where they were before they accidentally won both houses of Congress. Back then they could keep growing government by leaps and bounds while pretending to oppose it.
Post any of his emplyment history you like. I've been a worker since I was 13 years old. I have started and run a business. A no show paycheck job as a "clerk" for a law firm and investing some inherited money into a false front "energy company" isn't going to fly. Bush is a politician, he just started his career a few years later than most. He had to get sober before he could run for office you know.
You're right about one thing: it's useless to try to covert someone who looks with disdain on the cult of celebrity you belong to. No offense to you personally ma'am, but idolizing politicians is what allows the political class to destroy our country. You really should stop carrying water for them. They don't appreciate it and will simply use you until you're of no more use.
You keep saying we need to elect more conservatives to Congress. Tell me how you propose to do that when the GOP insists on running people like Liddy Dole? The GOP doesn't want conservatives in office. They have been doing their utmost to drive conservatives out of their party ever since Reagan won his second term.
The GOP's old line party elite saw to it that Reagan was an anomoly. They'll never let that happen again. This "pragmatic" crap you boys have been handing us about "principled losers" has worn so thin that it only has one side. The GOP is the main obstacle to conservatism in the US. Bush's presidency should be the final proof of that.
Paula Jones?
No, Farmer Jones. From Animal Farm.
My reply was to someone who'd referenced 1984, so I referenced Animal Farm. I wondered how many would "get it." Surely, most here have read Orwell's Animal Farm?
Every time the pigs removed another liberty, and the animals grumbled, Squealer would explain: "Do you know what would happen if Comrade Napolean didn't cut rations? Why, Jones would come back! You don't want that, do you Comrades?"
Farmer Jones became the great Boogeyman, the excuse for every totalitarian act. Every regime has one. Liberals (as opposed to Leftists) put up with Clinton's tyranny for fear that "Reaganism would come back!"
Lately, every statist policy, advanced by conservatives or Leftists, is justified by "the war on terror." If we don't [fill in the blank] Osama will have won! The terrorists will have won!
We're at war, comrades! We must support everything X does, or Osama will win! You don't want that, do you comrades?
In the 1990s, everything statist action was "for the children." Now it's because "there's a war on."
Usually nonsense statist lies.
Here's the truth:
Summer jobs he held before and during college:
1) department store sports equipment salesman,
2) ranch hand,
3) roughneck on oilrig,
4) mail delivery boy for a business.
After college he received a paycheck for scrambling his F-102 fighter jet with interceptor missiles while pulling much night duty. Like when the Air Force called they had UFO to be checked out, he would go up during the Cold War, just like the guys flying over D.C. and New York are doing now during the War on Terror.
I assume you mean that guys in the Guard and the Military are all lazy bums who don't do a lick of work.
While on reserve (he had a six year hitch in the Texas Guard), he also worked in a business selling tropical plants, an entry level job in company management requiring selling on the road.
He volunteered in a mentoring program in an inner city project one summer.
After getting his MBA from Harvard, an advanced degree which requires no work, (like graduating in history from Yale requires no work), he ran his own business. And as a business owner, I know that certainly required no work when I had three employees. He had fifteen employees and met all his payrolls.
He never worked a lick as general manager of the Rangers. Just sat in the stands at every game and waved to the crowd and talked with the fans and went to all those public events and meetings promoting the Rangers.
He never worked a lick as the only two term Governor of Texas. The stupid taxpayers paid him for nothing.
The presidential campaign was a cake walk. He never worked hard enough to earn your stupid vote, that's for sure.
And he doesn't work a lick as President. Cheney does it all, from the cave, right?
You are one first class jerk.
For whatever reason, this keeps coming up when I hit the previous page button on my phone.
It is fun to take a refresher on history tho...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.