[firewalk]

I choose option 2. That being that this forum is heavily populated with head-in-the-sand sheeple who are terrified at the prospect of thinking for themselves.

It's not right to call people names just because they won't see things your way. The difference of opinion here contradicts what you say. It would be much easier I think to go over to the other threads, and bash President Bush with everyone else. Other people have a right to their opinion too, even when you don't agree with it.

[jurisdog]

It's not right to call people names just because they won't see things your way. The difference of opinion here contradicts what you say. It would be much easier I think to go over to the other threads, and bash President Bush with everyone else. Other people have a right to their opinion too, even when you don't agree with it.

I'm all for different opinions, especially when people explain. What I'm not for is the typical freeper response to an honest criticism of the President. They call you names, they question your integrity, they call you a disrupter (without bothering to respond to the merits of what you posted), they point out your registration date, etc. I haven't seen this many ignorant people that claim to be conservatives gathered together. It's pretty shocking.