Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul In Cape Two
No way Bush could have gotten Congress to up the individual contribution limits & increase accountability by themselves.

Can you imagine Bush taking an active role in this dogfight?? :) The 'rats 'n RINOs would have made an issue out of every single thing he said. Instead, he issued some principles, and since they basically ignored him, he's going to take the hand he's dealt and use it to his advantage as best he can. :)

Of course it is a gamble that the SCOTUS will rule the correct way, but it is a good gamble. Restricting political speech is blatantly unconstitutional, and even the Sin-ators and REPS knew that. And if the Republicans take a working majority into 2003, pending a "no" vote by SCOTUS, you might even see a reversal to that stupid provision introduced. :)

20 posted on 03/27/2002 1:02:15 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Recovering_Democrat
President Bush even said today that he's going to concentrate on electing Republicans to the Senate, and keep the majority in the House. Once that's done, he has 2 years of clear sailing for judicial nominees and SCOTUS (3-4) appointments without putting up with Leahy et al vomitous.

Thanks for starting this topic.

41 posted on 03/27/2002 1:08:47 PM PST by Paul In Cape Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson