[ArrogantBustard]

It is NOT his place to determine whether the law is constitutional or not.

That is false. The President may veto a bill for any reason, or none at all. Constitutional problems would be one reason for a veto, and that reason has been used many times since the founding of theRepublic.

AB

[Poohbah]

However, someone with a less constrained view of what is Constitutional could sign it into law later.

Better that the courts kill this law for good.